Marketing & sales

UK consumer law for marketers: reviews, influencers, green claims

The UK Competition and Markets Authority's guidance for marketers under the DMCC Act: unfair commercial practices (CMA207) with worked examples, the fake reviews ban (CMA208), publishing consumer reviews, social media endorsements for brands and content creators, and the Green Claims Code on environmental claims. For marketing, e-commerce and compliance teams selling to UK consumers. Curated by Kopik from public sources: Competition and Markets Authority, GOV.UK (OGL v3).

Ask your question

Free account required

Each question stands alone · 1 free a month, then with a subscription.

Answers are written by a language model solely from this base's documents, with numbered sources. They can be wrong and aren't legal, medical or financial advice: check the sources before any important decision.

This assistant answers questions about UK consumer protection law as it applies to marketing: unfair commercial practices, fake and incentivised reviews, influencer endorsements and environmental claims. It is meant for marketing, e-commerce and compliance teams selling to UK consumers, and for content creators. Every answer comes from Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) guidance published on GOV.UK, including CMA207, CMA208 and the Green Claims Code.

What the DMCC Act changes for marketers

The Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act 2024 (DMCC Act) contains the protection from unfair trading provisions that the CMA explains in its CMA207 guidance. According to that guidance, these provisions apply to commercial practices that happen from 6 April 2025 onwards. The Act also includes new or more detailed prohibitions on practices relating to fake consumer reviews and on 'drip pricing', where an initial headline price is shown and additional mandatory charges are introduced as the consumer proceeds with a purchase.

The CMA describes two main types of unfair commercial practice. Some practices are always considered unfair: Schedule 20 to the DMCC Act lists 32 banned commercial practices that are unfair in all circumstances.

Other practices are only unfair if they are likely to cause the 'average consumer' to take a 'transactional decision' they would not otherwise have taken. This covers misleading actions, misleading omissions, aggressive practices and conduct that falls short of professional diligence, which works as a safety net.

The guidance lists four types of misleading action: false or misleading information, an overall presentation likely to deceive, marketing that creates confusion with another trader or its product, and failing to comply with a code of conduct the trader claims to follow.

Banned practices marketers often meet

Several of the 32 banned practices concern everyday marketing. Examples from Schedule 20 include claiming to be a signatory to a code of conduct when you are not, displaying a trust mark or quality mark without authorisation, and claiming approval or endorsement by a public or private body when the claim is false.

Others concern offers and urgency: falsely stating that a product will only be available for a limited time to push an immediate decision, advertising products at a price you have reasonable grounds to believe you cannot supply in reasonable quantities without saying so, and presenting rights that consumers have by law as a distinctive feature of your offer.

The average consumer and aggressive practices

The CMA describes the average consumer as a notional construct. Where a group of consumers is particularly vulnerable to a practice, and the trader could reasonably foresee it, the relevant average consumer is the average member of that group. Information the trader conceals is treated as unknown to the average consumer, even if they could find it through their own research.

Aggressive practices are those using harassment, coercion or undue influence that are likely to change the average consumer's decision. Undue influence means exploiting a position of power to apply pressure that significantly limits the consumer's ability to make an informed decision.

Learning from worked examples

The CMA publishes worked examples showing how one practice can break several rules at once. In its second hand car example, a car 'clocked' to show 25,000 miles instead of 95,000 is analysed as a misleading action, a misleading omission and a breach of professional diligence.

The CMA also points out that the trader does not need to complete the sale to breach these rules: stating the false information is enough. Other examples cover doorstep home improvement sales and debt collection letters made to look like court papers.

To use this assistant, ask a concrete question about your own product page, review widget, creator campaign or sustainability slogan. The CMA notes that its guidance is not legal advice, and the same applies to the answers given here.

Frequently asked questions

What penalties can apply for breaching the banned practices?

CMA207 states that breaches of all banned practices can attract civil action by enforcement authorities. This can lead to compliance directions and/or monetary penalties of up to the higher of £300,000 or 10% of worldwide turnover. Some breaches are also criminal offences, with penalties that can include a fine and up to two years imprisonment.

Who enforces these rules?

The guidance names the CMA, local Trading Standards Services (local weights and measures authorities) and, in Northern Ireland, the Department for the Economy as bodies that can take action. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) separately enforces industry rules on advertising.

Is drip pricing allowed under the DMCC Act?

No. The CMA explains that showing consumers an initial headline price and then introducing additional mandatory charges as they proceed with a purchase is prohibited. More detail on price presentation is in the CMA's price transparency guidance (CMA209).

Does a small mistake in my marketing automatically break the law?

Not necessarily for practices outside the banned list. CMA207 gives the example that a typo in an email or a trader's address is, in most cases, unlikely to cause the average consumer to take a different decision, even if the information is false. The 32 banned practices, however, are unfair in all circumstances.

Which documents does the assistant use?

It draws on seven CMA publications: the unfair commercial practices guidance (CMA207) and its examples page, the fake reviews guidance (CMA208), the short guide on publishing consumer reviews, the two social media endorsement guides for brands and content creators, and the Green Claims Code.

Can I say a product is approved by an official body or code?

Only if it is true and the terms of that approval are being complied with. Making such a claim falsely is one of the banned practices. One CMA example describes a trader claiming its code was 'approved by the Chartered Trading Standards Institute' when it had not been.

For developers and agents

Embed / API / MCP

Connect this base to Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT or your own app. Each API or MCP request costs €0.10, charged to your Kopik credit (not charged if nothing is found). You need an API key: create one from your dashboard.

MCP for your agents

This base's MCP server URL (tools ask_base and search_base):

MCP URL
https://kopik.io/api/mcp?base=uk-cma-consumer-law-reviews-influencers-green-claims
Claude Code, Cursor and other clients
Claude Code
claude mcp add --transport http kopik-uk-cma-consumer-law-reviews-influencers-green-claims "https://kopik.io/api/mcp?base=uk-cma-consumer-law-reviews-influencers-green-claims" --header "Authorization: Bearer kpk_…"
JSON config (mcpServers)
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "kopik-uk-cma-consumer-law-reviews-influencers-green-claims": {
      "url": "https://kopik.io/api/mcp?base=uk-cma-consumer-law-reviews-influencers-green-claims",
      "headers": {
        "Authorization": "Bearer kpk_…"
      }
    }
  }
}

REST API for your apps

mode is "answer" (written answer + sources) or "passages" (raw passages only). Add an optional maxPriceCents to cap the price: if the base costs more, the call is refused and nothing is charged.

curl
curl -X POST https://kopik.io/api/v1/bases/uk-cma-consumer-law-reviews-influencers-green-claims/query \
  -H "Authorization: Bearer kpk_…" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{"question": "Your question here", "mode": "answer"}'

Getting started

  1. Create a key in your dashboard and top up your credit.
  2. Replace kpk_… with your key.
  3. Full details (responses, errors, JS and Python examples): developer docs.